> As one example, the gaia wg had some really interesting speakers from > poorer parts of the world that got there somehow, when it was first > formed. How did that happen? Is it still happening? I don't know, but I suspect ISOC had a hand in it. Special facilities for participants from developing countries are an excellent thing, although the ISOC Fellowships seem to be on hold at the moment. Regards Brian On 11-May-19 09:52, Dave Taht wrote: > changing the subject line here, and killing some ccs. Is this > something that also belongs on the iesg list? > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:34 PM Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 11-May-19 02:12, Joe Touch wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On May 10, 2019, at 7:00 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mellon@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On May 10, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> The only people who get a fully free ride that I know of are the IEEE Comsoc Board. >>>> >>>> Hm. I’ve never paid to attend IETF. Granted, this is not because IETF comped me, but because I was fortunate enough to have an employer who could afford to send me at no cost to me. >>>> >>>> This model unfortunately doesn’t work for open source developers who are not on the payroll of a company with deep pockets. >>> >>> Nor academics. I stopped coming because I couldn’t find a gov’t agency interested in supporting my participation either (and my current employer doesn’t either). >>> >>> This is a problem not only for general attendance but also for the IESG - which impacts some decisions being made as well. >> >> Of course. But none of this is new and the world is a hard place. I missed one of the vital meetings of the IPng Directorate in 1994, the meeting that was the last chance for a major change of direction for what would become IPv6, because my then employer (CERN) had limited travel funds. I've always regretted missing that meeting. Too bad for me. >> >> On 11-May-19 06:19, Keith Moore wrote: >> >>> On 5/10/19 11:53 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: >>> >>>> On May 10, 2019, at 11:10 AM, Tom Herbert <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> Maybe there should be a "non-sponsored" registration tier with a discount to help make it affordable for the little guys. >>>> >>>> The problem is figuring out a sustainability model for IETF that doesn’t rely on attendance fees and hotel stays. >>> >>> >>> And this has been a problem since the early 1990s when the US government stopped subsidizing the meetings (and perhaps also the secretariat?). But I wish we'd try harder to find that sustainability model rather than constantly punting the problem, because the Internet has been suffering for all that time from a lack of diverse participation in IETF. >> >> I don't see how the IETF is supposed to fix the fact that independent open source developers are, um, independent. There is no money tree. And if you change the model such that funded attendees are subsidising unfunded attendees in significant numbers, guess what? > > I'm not sure this actually follows. In other conferences you can apply > for aid. The requirements are pretty strict, you have to prove you are > unable to afford the fee, and in the ietf context, you'd also have to > prove you have something to say, not just attend. > > As one example, the gaia wg had some really interesting speakers from > poorer parts of the world that got there somehow, when it was first > formed. How did that happen? Is it still happening? > > A second idea, is that speakers in other conferences are usually free > or at a substantial discount. > > What percentage of ietf attendees actually present their work? > >> The number of funded attendees will rapidly decline. It seems to me that the current focus on improving remote attendance facilities is really the best we can do, but again: if remote attendance really becomes as good as on-site attendance, the number of funded atttendees will rapidly decline. > > I certainly do believe physical attendance helps. The hallway track is > the best part of nearly any conference, actually. (in my case this > past ietf, after our major meeting was done with for the week, I just > sat outside and played my funny computer filksongs and all sorts of > people from all over ietf came to talk to me; that part of ietf was > great, as was the friday concert... The funniest part though was when > stuart threw a few hundred crowns in my case, which was the most I'd > ever made busking in my life....) > >> I think that if there was a viable answer to this problem, we'd already have found it. >> >> Brian >> >> > >
