Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017-09-26 12:12, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:40, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:

Once again - which?

The most directly relevant standards here are Unicode and STD0063 (RFC3629).
RFC5198 is a useful additional data point.

Grüße, Carsten

Please cite *specifically* what you think is relevant with respect to the use of BOMs in plain text files.

Best regards, Julian




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]