On 2017-09-26 11:39, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:19, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:
On 2017-09-26 10:03, John C Klensin wrote:
... > ".uf8", rather than relying on in-file indicators that violate
the relevant standards, don't adequately identify the relevant
...
Precisely what relevant standard is violated by inserting a BOM?
The violation is a bit subtle, maybe.
All relevant standards have made a point about forbidding, or in certain cases, NOT RECOMMENDING but tolerating BOM pollution.
Once again - which?
Best regards, Julian