Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017-09-26 10:03, John C Klensin wrote:
... > ".uf8", rather than relying on in-file indicators that violate
the relevant standards, don't adequately identify the relevant
...

Precisely what relevant standard is violated by inserting a BOM?




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]