Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications

["touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed, but I think WGLC as the gate to IESG review is an important step and the only one such step missing.

Joe

—

Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist

www.strayalpha.com

On Feb 27, 2022, at 10:03 PM, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

There are quite a few things missing. The challenge is where to stop, and how much detail do you want in tutorial diagram.

Regards,
    Brian Carpenter
    (via tiny screen & keyboard)

On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, 17:52 touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think you left out WGLC.

Joe