Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications

To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@xxxxxxxx>, IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "admin-discuss@xxxxxxxx" <admin-discuss@xxxxxxxx>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 16:58:32 -0500
Comments: In-reply-to tom petch <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> message dated "Sat, 26 Feb 2022 12:52:52 +0000."
In-reply-to: <621A22A4.600@btconnect.com>
References: <164574145917.13799.12710132950530774405@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMC+vkyMPbt755Bu0cZHfmY-Pz6CdU1-J+8sBa8cPkA0dg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMeRFOU+az=b8QJmD+-4GHivwZenMHEXsrbnamuoEmwEA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAg_xbTODu=UE288uxTVhL=+r18p5ywC6ZGaUvpyXO8bA@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB42177A57FE4D4225E0A0393E983E9@HE1PR07MB4217.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CABcZeBM846ieTHAHM3UaHwO-cJB7hu2xhOzLAO2th+T0CKbT-w@mail.gmail.com> <621A22A4.600@btconnect.com>

Perhaps we need a 1-minute (physics) video, in the spirit of "A Bill is Just
Bill on Capital Hill" to explain the RFC process.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
  - From: Michael Richardson

References:
- Public archival of AUTH48 communications
  - From: The IESG
- Re: Public archival of AUTH48 communications
  - From: Ted Hardie
- Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
  - From: Ted Hardie
- Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
  - From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
  - From: tom petch