--On Friday, February 25, 2022 10:03 -0800 Larry Masinter <LMM@xxxxxxx> wrote: > With the move to XML and renderings of a new RFC in different > formats, who is responsible for reviewing the different > renderings for unintended changes in meaning? If it's the > authors, I'd hope that a change in AUTH48 might offer some way > to spread the burden. > > FWIW Larry, based on the last document with which I went through AUTH48 (in the first half of 2020), it wasn't clear who, if anyone, was responsible for checking the different formats and renderings. Of course, the theory is that, if the XML is correct, everything else should take care of itself. I haven't felt it would be useful to try to push on that before the new model was in place although, back then, I hadn't dreamed it would take this long. But I agree with you that review should be done and that we need to think about how to do it, ideally without over-stretching or over-stressing the RPC. john
