Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications

["touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think you left out WGLC.

Joe

—

Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist

www.strayalpha.com

On Feb 27, 2022, at 7:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 28-Feb-22 14:15, Michael Richardson wrote:

I think that 97% of how an internet-draft becomes an RFC will not be changing
as a result of the RSCE.

I'd say 100%. I'm no good at videos or poetry, but I can work LibreOffice.
An attempt at a diagram (two pages) is at https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/id-flow.pdf
As far as AUTH48 goes, it corresponds to current practice.

I'm more than happy to put the source file on github if anybody's interested.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest