Re: [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There are quite a few things missing. The challenge is where to stop, and how much detail do you want in tutorial diagram.

Regards,
    Brian Carpenter
    (via tiny screen & keyboard)

On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, 17:52 touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think you left out WGLC.

Joe

Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist

On Feb 27, 2022, at 7:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 28-Feb-22 14:15, Michael Richardson wrote:

I think that 97% of how an internet-draft becomes an RFC will not be changing
as a result of the RSCE.

I'd say 100%. I'm no good at videos or poetry, but I can work LibreOffice.
An attempt at a diagram (two pages) is at https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/id-flow.pdf
As far as AUTH48 goes, it corresponds to current practice.

I'm more than happy to put the source file on github if anybody's interested.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux