--On Saturday, February 26, 2022 17:07 -0500 Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Perhaps we need a 1-minute (physics) video, in the > spirit of "A Bill is > Just Bill on Capital Hill" to > explain the RFC process. > > Uhm, I fat fingered the send now button. > "I'm just a Bill" > > The link to go long with this is: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgVKvqTItto Would you propose doing that now, after the new Model has settled in enough that one can describe the new process (noting, in particular, that, in case of disputes, the RSE now has a role (and authority) while, in the new model, the RSCE does not unless the whole RSAB gets dragged in). Or would you propose to do it twice? And, while a Bill is Just a Bill on Capital Hill, the different streams, and, in practice, the different treatment of WG and non-WG and Informational and Experimental versus Standards Track documents in the IETF Stream would probably take a lot more than a minute :-) Another argument for deferring this until the RSWG can get into the act? john
