Hi, Joel,
I would have thought that the primary thread that would be useful to be shown for a draft is:
Individual draft
discussion and improvement
WG adoption (no details, just that it usually occurs)
discussion and improvement
WG Last Call w/ discussion
AD Review w/ discussion
IETF Last Call w/ discussion
IESG Approval w/ discussion
editing
Publication
What’s the difference between AD review and the IESG step (isn’t that Review with discussion)? Individual draft
discussion and improvement
WG adoption (no details, just that it usually occurs)
discussion and improvement
WG Last Call w/ discussion
// remove: // AD Review w/ discussion
IETF Last Call w/ discussion
IESG //Review, changed from: Approval // w/ discussion
editing
With some notation somewhere that advancement along that sequence is not guaranteed.
As a flowchart, it’s not just that things can fail to advance, but at any point a doc can also be abandoned (i.e., exit the process).
But those steps are often easier to indicate as a note, rather than arcs everywhere.
Joe
|
