Re: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Les Mikesell wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:


Maintainers even if they are some which they are in some cases cannot avoid changes introduced for other reasons. In some cases, they try to stay in sync. In other cases, they have to deviate. Picking one point and ignoring others just keeps continuing your discussions endlessly.

But this is the only point with any potential for improvement.

It is interrelated to others. You can't improve any one thing in isolation.

 So end this discussion here and just move on.

Are you saying there is no hope for improvement?

Not with your suggestion solutions, no.

Then what solution is there other than switch to a distribution that hasn't fragmented its upstream support community this way?

Try finding one more suitable for your magic needs. Good luck.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux