On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 7:40 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Bias is not the same thing as a conflict of interest. And it doesn't > inherently result in unfairness. Sometimes it is a matter avoiding even the appearance of impropriety that could be raised at a later date to question the process/motives/decisions (which often just delays the inevitable, but sometimes the delay is the point). Regardless, I would suggest that along the way, if FESCo does not have a set of guidelines regarding if recusal on any vote is appropriate, they should consider writing down whatever they decide is appropriate (or just point to some other groups process if that is appropriate), even if the decision is no recusal is ever required, so we don't have this discussion all over again in a year or two when everyone has forgotten this one. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
