Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:21 PM Gary Buhrmaster
<gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 7:40 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Bias is not the same thing as a conflict of interest. And it doesn't
> > inherently result in unfairness.
>
> Sometimes it is a matter avoiding even the appearance
> of impropriety that could be raised at a later date to
> question the process/motives/decisions (which often
> just delays the inevitable, but sometimes the delay is
> the point).

Of course voting members need to trust their instincts. I only mean to
indicate bias is not the same thing as a conflict of interest; and
also further that a very strong preference that's predicated on
evidence and experience isn't even bias, certainly not in the
prejudiced sense. Anyone who thinks their objectivity is compromised
on some topic should recuse; and anyone who knows another's
objectivity is compromised should feel comfortable to point this out
and ask for recusal.

> Regardless, I would suggest that along the way, if
> FESCo does not have a set of guidelines regarding
> if recusal on any vote is appropriate, they should consider
> writing down whatever they decide is appropriate (or
> just point to some other groups process if that is
> appropriate), even if the decision is no recusal is
> ever required, so we don't have this discussion all
> over again in a year or two when everyone has
> forgotten this one.

It's reasonable to have clarity on the issue. I'm not an ombudsman or
ethicist, but there is such a person or group within Red Hat who could
answer this question. It might even be as straightforward as each
voting member filling out a questionnaire so that their possible
conflicts are known, and they can steer clear of such areas. But I
think Fedora has quite a lot of compartmentalization in the
organizational structure that just inherently avoids the problem.

Anyway I came across this which is informative, even though it applies
mainly to charities (Fedora is a non-profit so it's approximate).
https://charitylawyerblog.com/2014/02/10/managing-conflicts-of-interest/


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux