On 11. 05. 20 19:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One strong argument for the proposed change is that, currently, an abstention or recusal (TIL that's the proper term) is essentially equivalent to a negative vote. (As long as we require +5 to pass, any vote apart from +1 has the same effect.) In a hypothetical case where three or four FESCo members were involved in a change and decided to recuse themselves, a proposal gets a very high bar of 5/6 or 5/7 votes. If one or two voting members are absent, the change may not even pass even if*all* non-abstaining members are in favour.
If that is the only problem we are trying to solve here, I think we might very well create a concept of formal recusal and only lower the bar on such occasion.
-- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
