Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:23 AM Michal Konecny <mkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 31/01/2020 12:11, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 31. 01. 20 v 1:43 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:51 PM Randy Barlow
> >> <bowlofeggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:30 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>>> cough cough errata cough cough
> >>>>
> >>>> Honestly, sometimes the disconnect between what is going on in Fedora
> >>>> and internally in Red Hat is intriguing.
> >>> I did think about Errata tool* a bit back when I worked on Bodhi.
> >
> > Thank you for that.
> >
> >
> >>>   I
> >>> like the idea of sharing code on one hand, but on the other hand it is
> >>> pretty oriented towards workflows that are designed for a product
> >>> release cycle. Bodhi is designed around community feedback (and now CI
> >>> feedback).
> >>>
> >>> It could be interesting to hold a chat with the Errata tool developers
> >>> to see if there is interest in sharing tooling, but it may be a lot of
> >>> effort to make Errata tool flexible enough to support two pretty
> >>> different workflows. I'd be willing to have that conversation; I could
> >>> be wrong.
> >>>
> > Of course, there is a lot of business logic specific to Red Hat projects
> > backed into Errata, but ultimately, it does not help to anybody if
> > Fedora release process is using different tools then Red Hat internally.
> > What Red Hat does internally should be just extension to what Fedora
> > does. The processes used internally should be proven in Fedora first.
> This is a very nice vision that will potentially make life of Red Hat
> and Fedora much easier. I'm not that long in the Fedora project to know,
> why Fedora and Red Hat internal tools are that different, but this idea
> doesn't sound that bad. Few questions first:
> Are those internal tools open source?
> Could we as Fedora community use them?
> Is there any legal issue?
> Is this tool in good shape?
>
> And talking about the git forge, what is Red Hat using internally as git
> forge? And then the above questions applies.
>

It was mentioned in a different part of this thread that Red Hat is
using pagure internally.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux