On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:30 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > cough cough errata cough cough > > Honestly, sometimes the disconnect between what is going on in Fedora > and internally in Red Hat is intriguing. I did think about Errata tool* a bit back when I worked on Bodhi. I like the idea of sharing code on one hand, but on the other hand it is pretty oriented towards workflows that are designed for a product release cycle. Bodhi is designed around community feedback (and now CI feedback). It could be interesting to hold a chat with the Errata tool developers to see if there is interest in sharing tooling, but it may be a lot of effort to make Errata tool flexible enough to support two pretty different workflows. I'd be willing to have that conversation; I could be wrong. * Red Hat uses a project called Errata tool to publish updates.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
