On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:51 PM Randy Barlow <bowlofeggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:30 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > cough cough errata cough cough > > > > Honestly, sometimes the disconnect between what is going on in Fedora > > and internally in Red Hat is intriguing. > > I did think about Errata tool* a bit back when I worked on Bodhi. I > like the idea of sharing code on one hand, but on the other hand it is > pretty oriented towards workflows that are designed for a product > release cycle. Bodhi is designed around community feedback (and now CI > feedback). > > It could be interesting to hold a chat with the Errata tool developers > to see if there is interest in sharing tooling, but it may be a lot of > effort to make Errata tool flexible enough to support two pretty > different workflows. I'd be willing to have that conversation; I could > be wrong. > Why not go the other way? Bodhi could be extended to support the internal product workflows. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
