Dne 31. 01. 20 v 1:43 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:51 PM Randy Barlow > <bowlofeggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:30 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> cough cough errata cough cough >>> >>> Honestly, sometimes the disconnect between what is going on in Fedora >>> and internally in Red Hat is intriguing. >> I did think about Errata tool* a bit back when I worked on Bodhi. Thank you for that. >> I >> like the idea of sharing code on one hand, but on the other hand it is >> pretty oriented towards workflows that are designed for a product >> release cycle. Bodhi is designed around community feedback (and now CI >> feedback). >> >> It could be interesting to hold a chat with the Errata tool developers >> to see if there is interest in sharing tooling, but it may be a lot of >> effort to make Errata tool flexible enough to support two pretty >> different workflows. I'd be willing to have that conversation; I could >> be wrong. >> Of course, there is a lot of business logic specific to Red Hat projects backed into Errata, but ultimately, it does not help to anybody if Fedora release process is using different tools then Red Hat internally. What Red Hat does internally should be just extension to what Fedora does. The processes used internally should be proven in Fedora first. > Why not go the other way? Bodhi could be extended to support the > internal product workflows. > > > In ideal world, Bodhi would be upstream project to Errata or possibly Bodhi could be the open core of Errata. It does not really matter. Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
