Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 30. 01. 20 v 18:45 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:30 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> My point is that we have to dedicate a team to work on Pagure, I would
>>> rather have these people working on improving the infrastructure so
>>> that we don't need these heroics to happen. If we don't put people to
>>> work on Pagure it will end up being another fedora-packages, badges or
>>> FAS and in couple years it will be too difficult to do anything with
>>> it. It is not only about Pagure, for example I would love to be able
>>> to replace Bodhi with something that we don't have to maintain but it
>>> is much more difficult to find an alternative to Bodhi
>> cough cough errata cough cough
>>
>> Honestly, sometimes the disconnect between what is going on in Fedora
>> and internally in Red Hat is intriguing.
> Do you really think the entire CPE team is blissfully unaware of Errata
> Tool's existence?


I have never say that. I merely pointed out that there is disconnect
between what Fedora does and what Red Hat does internally. I see a lot
of duplication and I see a lot of lost opportunities. Bodhi vs Errata is
just one example.

The other example is that Red Hat adopted Pagure internally, so if CPE
decides to let Pagure go, that decision will impact Red Hat as well and
it somehow seems to be completely fine by everybody. If there was one
person fulltime coordinating Pagure upstream, we would save a lot of
time which was already wasted here by this discussion and we would save
all the costs of possible future migration where there will be suddenly
helping whole teams just to let later the whole migration project in
unfinished state and slowly dying.

And the another thread about Java packaging is of similar nature (not
going to details here).


Vít


>  I mean, is that really the scenario that makes the
> most sense in your head, as opposed to 'they have already considered it
> but don't find it a suitable replacement'?
>
> You might ask 'why not errata
> tool?', but it seems pretty silly to just assume that they don't even
> know it exists, or something.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux