On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:30 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > My point is that we have to dedicate a team to work on Pagure, I would > > rather have these people working on improving the infrastructure so > > that we don't need these heroics to happen. If we don't put people to > > work on Pagure it will end up being another fedora-packages, badges or > > FAS and in couple years it will be too difficult to do anything with > > it. It is not only about Pagure, for example I would love to be able > > to replace Bodhi with something that we don't have to maintain but it > > is much more difficult to find an alternative to Bodhi > > cough cough errata cough cough > > Honestly, sometimes the disconnect between what is going on in Fedora > and internally in Red Hat is intriguing. Do you really think the entire CPE team is blissfully unaware of Errata Tool's existence? I mean, is that really the scenario that makes the most sense in your head, as opposed to 'they have already considered it but don't find it a suitable replacement'? You might ask 'why not errata tool?', but it seems pretty silly to just assume that they don't even know it exists, or something. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
