Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 15:58 Adam Saleh <asaleh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Way we were discussing this, I think there were several points I didn't really see here.

a) we are gathering requirements for Git Forge, but we need a good Dist Git as well.

There might be difference in requirements and tooling for Dist Git compared to generic fully featured Git Forge.
It might still be useful to abandon Pagure as a full-featured git-forge and instead focus on making it really useful as a dist-git solution.

b) Whatever we decide, there will be significant investment required.
Either by re-investing in our existing solution, or in the migration effort.

I think we really want to avoid the `Polarion` situation, where we wouldn't
be clear about all of the costs involved in migration, and end up with a solution that only saved effort/money on paper,
and in reality it could cost many a man-day of migration/maintenance/workaround efforts.

I am not yet sure how to make this less vague, and more "Gathering requirements",
@Leigh Griffin will there be some sort of a poll in the end, or how do we actually get a list of requirements?

This thread is serving as a source of requirements (although it has meandered dramatically away from that) but I will default to the Fedora Council for how a combined set from the input in this thread and others is collated and presented. When all requirements are gathered from all stakeholders I will share the distilled version out.

I assume we are in the "Research" phase of ODF [1], but this is first time I am interacting with the framework :-)

We are in that phase of getting requirements and analyzing them. Sorry on my phone here so I can't be 100% sure of the formal phases off hand.

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 4:56 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:37 am, Michael Catanzaro
<mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It doesn't have as many features as github.com,

Sorry, this was a typo. I meant: it doesn't have as many features as
gitlab.com.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux