On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 23:57:03 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Did you at least check if the packages were used by something else? ... No, and that doesn't interest me at all. I am not doing EPEL packaging, and I consider it inacceptable that somebody assigns five years old EPEL tickets to me and expects me to handle the tickets as well as the packages. > That's because per-branch maintainership is no longer "supported", as > mentioned on recent other threads. That doesn't sound good. Is it anything final that has been communicated on devel-announce list in a clear way? Or is it buried beneath hundreds to thousands of posts on devel list? > It seems the "support" in PkgDB was also a "lie", because BugZilla > doesn't even support default assignees per-branch. It just worked, and when somebody opened a ticket about an EPEL package, the EPEL-specific maintainer became the assignee _by default_. Whether bugzilla knows a separate "default assignee" is beyond my interest, unless somebody or some script reassigns tickets to me which are not of my concern. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
