On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:28:02PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > That's all well and good, but you seem to be forgetting that people > are actually getting *paid* to work on modularity for fedora. > Any proposal for an alternative, which apparently needs to arrive at > least at MVP / proof-of-concept quality before it is even *considered* > as an alternative without getting called "trolling", can likely only > be worked on in somebody's spare time. I don't think that's a fair > requirement, and "exploring and contributing" will stay limited to RH > employees if that's the case. Well, it really depends on the circumstance. In general, it's just practical reality that a proof of concept or MVP will get you a lot further than a suggestion -- that's not, like, a Fedora law or something. There are certainly many examples of awesome great stuff that's been created in Fedora without the investment of Red Hat (or anyone's) full time employees. The zchunk metadata feature is a recent example. The Stewardship SIG is another one. This is good stuff, and I'm super-happy to support it. In both of those cases the people interested in that thing happening put in exactly the kind of effort I'm talking about here. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
