On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 15:48 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 18 December 2017 at 15:42, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > And in any case, a tie-in with a television-show related game is > > > clearly neither telemetry nor some kind of user interaction study. Yet > > > to me, Mozilla's response does not seem to convey understanding of this > > > at all. It basically just says "oh don't worry it didn't do anything by > > > default", which is sort of grandly missing the point. > > > > > > > Mozilla has already admitted they made a mistake and removed Looking Glass > > from the > > Fx Studies. I believe they understand the situation quite well. It's not > > helpful to beat > > a dead horse. > > > > The only reason we are beating a dead horse is because you keep > telling us that we shouldn't have beaten a dead horse in a way that > requires us to explain why we are doing so. Look we understand.. you > think we should all be friends again. Some of us however are on the > "Play a trick on me once, shame on you.. Play a trick on me twice.. > shame on me" and this is number 3 or 4.. Right. As my original mail should have made clear to you but apparently didn't, the point where I disagree with you is the idea that Mozilla has "learnt its lesson". Nothing in any Mozilla statement I've seen so far makes me believe that Mozilla has actually learned the right lesson, and as Smooge points out, it is beginning to build up a track record which makes me less willing to just trust that they have without them explicitly stating it and outlining exactly what they have changed in order to ensure that more things like this don't happen in future. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
