Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/10/2017 07:49 AM, Langdon White wrote:
[snip]
Exactly, yes, a huge *potential* problem. However, it is fixable with
policy and changeable by exception. Just because we can have 40
versions of one thing doesn't mean Fedora will allow that. However, if
there is a genuinely good reason and we can track whether that reason
continues to exist over time, having the capability is a win.

Is "the maintainer wants to keep maintaining it" a good enough reason? Because really when that is no longer true, that evaluation follows.

--
Brendan Conoboy / RHEL Development Coordinator / Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux