On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/06/2017 01:08 AM, drago01 wrote: >> >> Two suggestions were raised as alternatives to the container approach: >> >> * Switch to using the Debian style of multi-arch layout, which instead of >> /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 uses /usr/lib/$ARCH-linux-gnu. Benefits to this would >> include the emergence of a de-facto standard for system layout between the major >> distributions. >> >> * Ship only one arch in the repositories and allow users to trivially enable the >> repositories for other arches through DNF if they have need. >> >> >> >> * Keep things as they are, which means things keep to "just work" (tm) > > As Bill pointed out, things "just work" for users right now and that's something > we'd like to avoid breaking. However, that does *not* mean that it is trivial to > do on the build side. That may be, but shifting the complexity to the user is simply not an option that we should seriously consider. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
