Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/08/2017 01:52 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Brendan Conoboy wrote:
Enhancing interoperability increases the reach of Fedora and doesn't
require a bit of compromise on the the Freedom principle.

Splitting a single well-integrated distribution (where all the pieces are
known to work well together) into a bunch of loosely-coupled black-box
modules that have no idea what libraries the other modules even contain
actually DECREASES interoperability.

Only if you do not rebuild each modules from scratch (with the exception of the build tools themselves, but which do not end up in the module). If you do rebuild the module, the build process of each component could be made aware what is available in the module, and integrate well with the features which are available.

I think this would resemble what's being done in the embedded space with Yocto and BitBake.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux