Am 02.12.2015 um 21:46 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
The fact that you assert your absolute correctness on a frequent basis even when you're not correct makes me, and probably other people, likely to discount everything you say even in the cases when you are correct. If you want your opinion to be helpful, please reconsider how you write your emails.
the problem with that thread is that you discount anything because you refuse trying to understand that it is a *very* bad idea to touch *all* boot entries after a kernel install
Anyway, I filed an RFE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287854
and i answered why it is a bad idea there"regenerating config instead of incrementally" leads in change *intentional* differences of options when someone tries to debug kernel problems and much more worse: a bug there would render *all* boot options unbootable instead only the last installed one
frankly one can even raise "installonly_limit" by intention and have the same kernel version with *multiple* options - that all would be erased by try out if a newer build fixes the problem
now you can say: that's not a problem for the ordinary user i say: the ordianry user don't touch kernel options at all
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
