Am 02.12.2015 um 21:31 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Am 02.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:That's a matter of preference. If I have a newer kernel version installed that doesn't actually work, I want the older kernel I _just_ installed to be the default and top entry so my machine boots to something I can use. This happens often when people try rawhide -rcX kernels to test something. Fixing this might be better served by filing an RFE for grubby to change the preference order.Or file an RFE for grub2 to have an option to use the file timestamps instead of the version for the sort orderbreaking news: file timestamps of packages are independent of the install time so this can't work - any attributes like timestamp, owner, permision are part of the package for good reasons (rkhunter as example compares them with the rpm database)Can you please try to reduce your level of sarcasm on the list?
i try, but sometimes it's obviously needed
It's especially irritating when you're simultaneously sarcastic and factually incorrect:
no, i am 100% correct in that context or why does my kernel have a timestamp from yesterday but was updated today?
[root@rawhide ~]# cat /var/log/dnf.rpm.log | grep kernel | grep 4.4.0-0.rc3.git1.1
Dec 02 19:55:47 INFO Installed: kernel-core-4.4.0-0.rc3.git1.1.fc24.x86_64 Dec 02 19:55:47 INFO Installed: kernel-core-4.4.0-0.rc3.git1.1.fc24.x86_64 [root@rawhide ~]# ls -lha /boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-0.rc3.git1.1.fc24.x86_64-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6.4M 2015-12-01 17:34 /boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-0.rc3.git1.1.fc24.x86_64
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
