On Dec 2, 2015 8:15 AM, "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate
> > boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing?
> >
> > Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig appears to produce output
> > that's functionally identical to what grubby generates. Can we switch
> > new-kernel-pkg to just regenerate the grub2 config using
> > grub2-mkconfig instead of using grubby?
>
> I don't think so. Despite the similarity in name, grubby does more
> than just deal with grub stuff. Namely, it handles bootloaders that
> aren't grub. We're close to having all arches on grub2, but I believe
> armv7hl won't ever get there and it's a primary arch.
Could we switch for grub2 architectures and keep using grubby for other architectures?
--Andy
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
