Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/06/2014 05:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a nice theory. Sure. It's not a tenable basis on which to operate
in the real world of software. So if you want to argue that something
doesn't exist, check whether it exists. If you only check the
documentation, you're not checking the software, whatever your
philosophy on documentation (and there are others besides yours).

Well, undocumented 'features' always create problems, see this thread and protected packages in yum. As they are undocumented people argue about them etc. Include them i the documentation, and everyone knows about it.

Regarding 'real world'. Correct, that's why I wrote "...if they are not documented, then it is a documentation bug.", and that's how it should be treated.

Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson <lars@xxxxxxxx>
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux