On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 19:24 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: > On 01/05/2014 07:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:27 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: > ... > >>> The running kernel should not be removed with a simple 'dnf erase > >>> kernel' (why did they change remove into erase?), > >> > >> They didn't. Both work on both. > > > > It's symptomatic of how fucking terrible this thread is, btw, that > > people would post without checking any of this. It takes about ten > > seconds to open a kernel and run 'yum remove foo', 'yum erase foo', 'dnf > > remove foo', 'dnf erase foo'. If you're not going to go to *that* much > > trouble, it's a bit rich to start excoriating the dnf devs. > > As I mentioned before I only auto completed yum, remove is not party of > the auto completed commands. If remove should be there, then this is a > bug. I will file one. > > dnf has no auto completion and I have only seen reference to erase. The > man page of dnf does not mention remove (it mentions 'group remove'). > This should probably be added. I will file a bug on that one too. > > As a side not 'dnf --help' shows: > > '--version show Yum version and exit' > > which probably also is wrong. > > This is by no mean any excoriation of the dnf devs on my part. > > Three documentation "bugs" out of a side track of a thread is not a > terrible thread, in my opinion... If it exists for backward compatibility, it doesn't necessarily need to be documented. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
