On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
They really want to make dnf work this way.
This is explained here:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
Yes, I have read that, but (strongly) disagree.
The running kernel should not be removed with a simple 'dnf erase
kernel' (why did they change remove into erase?), a better solution
would be to safe guard the running kernel, only removing it if you
explicitly ask for it:
$ uname -a
Linux tux 3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 23 16:44:31 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ dnf erase kernel-3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64
The same thing could be said about other packages now protected in yum.
Please protect them in the same way in dnf.
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson <lars@xxxxxxxx>
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
