On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Richard Vickery <richard.vickeryrv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/444565.html >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/444563.html >> >> please realize that a drop-in replacement *first* needs to be *really* >> drop-in and not "somehow like", otherwise all the things you may make >> better are worthless >> >> and yes "yum remove kernel" is a *minimum* to handeled properly >> >> there are people maintaining RHEL5,RHEL6,RHEL7 and Fedora machines >> guess how abused they are if they have completly different behavior >> because dveleopers tend to call anything they don't like to implement >> a "border case" >> >> >> > > Reindl makes a very good case here against the adoption. The last thing we > want is to cause confusion in the community. It may be very wise to wait and > give the community more time to absorb dnf. I confess that it would be a > learning curve for me to use this command: I could imagine the headaches it > would bring others with much more pressing deadlines. > > my 2 cents, I don't understand what the learning curve is? It works exactly the same as yum. Typing 'dnf' instead of 'yum' is a learning curve? I'm confused. Dan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
