Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 21:41 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 2014-01-04 21:31, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
> > On 01/04/2014 08:56 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> * yum remove kernel vs dnf remove kernel difference (unfiled? )
> >
> > I found 976704, closed with 'Resolution: --- → UPSTREAM' in August. 
> > Not sure what that means, but removing all kernels seem a bit odd and 
> > at least the running kernel should be spared, in my opinion.
> >
> > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976704>
> >
> > Lars
> Hej...
> 
> Well, a lot of other (most?) folks have the same opinion - have a look 
> in the archives for this thread....

It's a bit hard to tell, but from the comment it looks like it was
really closed as 'notabug' rather than 'upstream'. 
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux