Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 05.01.2014 23:53, schrieb Chris Adams:
> Once upon a time, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> where would it be useful to uninstall base-package and YUM/DNF itself
>> bringing your system in a non-recoverable state?
> 
> I already offered a couple of examples that you ignored (just a couple
> that came to mind, certainly not an exhaustive list): when you have a
> system that doesn't load a kernel from the filesystem, such as a VM
> environment where the boot process is external.

border cases where you can use --nodeps

> Another is if you need to re-install the kernel RPM because files have
> been removed, overwritten, etc.; "yum reinstall" is documented (unlike
> this magic "feature") to not handle multi-install packages like the
> kernel.  The only way is going to be to "yum erase" and "yum install".

this is *really* a border case where download and "rpm -Uvh --force"
is the way to go

> Also, even removing every kernel RPM will not render your system
> "non-recoverable".  You can always use a boot CD, and in modern Fedora
> systems, the "rescue" kernel/initramfs are never removed (not owned by
> any RPM), so you should always be able to boot that

you can do that, i can do that
the ordianry user - i doubt



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux