On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 18:06 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 6.1.2014 17:53, Matthew Miller napsal(a): > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:36:09AM -0700, Tim Flink wrote: > >> One of the primary reasons for replacing AutoQA with taskotron is to > >> make it easier for folks to contribute checks. AutoQA's implementation > >> just isn't capable of doing that in a reasonable fashion. We haven't > >> gotten into the specifics of how package-specific checks would work > >> yet, but one idea was to keep them in the package's git repo. > > What about including them in the RPMs themselves, in a new section similar > > to the existing %check -- or just in a standard file location (so no changes > > to RPM itself are needed immediately)? > > > > Not sure how RPM fits here. For example, Ruby on Rails framework consist > of 8 basic packages and I'd like to be able to do some basic integration > test if any of this packages is rebuilt. This is totally independent of > RPM IMO. We are still very interested in having installed tests for the GNOME stack run in the Fedora context. See here: https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests These tests also assume that they are running in a session on an installed system, not at build time in a build system. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
