Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 06.01.2014 14:06, schrieb Vít Ondruch:
> Also, I'd like to point out that "yum/dnf remove" by default shows what it is going to do and you have to
> explicitly confirm the action, isn't it enough? How much protection do you need?

to say it clear - *all* protection to avoid breaking the system
otherwise as example i would not have learned which packages can
be removed resulting in strip down some Fedora servers to 600 MB

what *never* must happen is that YUM or DNF are killing itself, rpm
or render the setup unbootable - period - there is *nothing* to discuss


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux