Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 6.1.2014 13:31, Lars E. Pettersson napsal(a):
On 01/06/2014 12:43 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Otherwise, I totally agree with Chris and with DNF upstream. "dnf remove
kernel" should remove every kernel and should not behave magically.

What would be the point in removing the running kernel? Is there actually such a use case?

Lars

Why are you asking? May be you should let your imagination run riot.

I don't even remember I ever needed "yum remove kernel". Does it mean that "yum remove kernel" should not work at all no matter if it leaves running kernel on the system or not? Or should it be completely prohibited? Why we keep 3 versions of kernel on the system anyway?

Also, I'd like to point out that "yum/dnf remove" by default shows what it is going to do and you have to explicitly confirm the action, isn't it enough? How much protection do you need?



Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux