Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
> Am 06.01.2014 14:06, schrieb Vít Ondruch:
> > Also, I'd like to point out that "yum/dnf remove" by default shows what it
> > is going to do and you have to
> > explicitly confirm the action, isn't it enough? How much protection do you
> > need?
> 
> to say it clear - *all* protection to avoid breaking the system
> otherwise as example i would not have learned which packages can
> be removed resulting in strip down some Fedora servers to 600 MB
> 
> what *never* must happen is that YUM or DNF are killing itself, rpm
> or render the setup unbootable - period - there is *nothing* to discuss

Hm, so the rm should refuse to do "rm /usr/bin/rm", chmod: "chmod -x /usr/bin/chmod", etc., am I getting it right?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux