Am 06.01.2014 16:12, schrieb Tomas Mlcoch: >> Am 06.01.2014 14:06, schrieb Vít Ondruch: >>> Also, I'd like to point out that "yum/dnf remove" by default shows what it >>> is going to do and you have to >>> explicitly confirm the action, isn't it enough? How much protection do you >>> need? >> >> to say it clear - *all* protection to avoid breaking the system >> otherwise as example i would not have learned which packages can >> be removed resulting in strip down some Fedora servers to 600 MB >> >> what *never* must happen is that YUM or DNF are killing itself, rpm >> or render the setup unbootable - period - there is *nothing* to discuss > > Hm, so the rm should refuse to do "rm /usr/bin/rm", chmod: "chmod -x /usr/bin/chmod", etc., am I getting it right? is "rm" supposed to work this way? is "rm" supposed to be replaced by dnf? is "rm" used to solve dependencies? is "rm" responsible for a consistent package managment? i guess no because "rm" is not a package-manager someone tries to rewrite
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
