Re: communications and community [was Re: Lack of response about sponsorship]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 02:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> Adam says that devel is relevant to "*developers* (or rather, packagers)".
> Yet there is the "packaging" list, too. Quote from Oct 16th:
> "I don't know whether this belongs to the packaging or devel list,"

Now to me, THAT seems like a redundancy :) devel@ is the list for, well,
developing Fedora. Is there a history behind the packaging list? I'm not
familiar with it. Is it actually used much?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux