Re: communications and community [was Re: Lack of response about sponsorship]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> The intended usage of "test" list has always been a problem. Once in a
> while, somebody points that out, but there's nobody (no leadership) to
> work on a change actively. Is it only for Test releases or also for
> Rawhide? Its description is vague. Is there not any "testing and quality
> assurance" for non-Test releases?

Huh. I don't remember this ever coming up as a problem before, but I
could've drunk away the memory. As far as I know it's the QA list; it
covers testing of Fedora, so yes, it covers Rawhide use, in fact
discussion of Rawhide use is quite a common topic area for test@. Do you
have any references for its purpose being considered unclear?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux