On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too; Unlike "devel", the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it? Could you imagine turning "devel" into a less general list? Is "devel" the catch-all for anything related to arbitrary "development issues in the Fedora Project"? doc-fol [no description available] docs For participants of the Documentation Project docs-commits For tracking commits to Docs Project owned modules docs-qa Fedora Docs QA list > > > To me, at least, test@ has a very clear and specific purpose which is > > > quite different from devel@, > > > > So "very clear" that "qa-devel" has been split off early this year, after > > the Fedora QA trac notifications had caused a flood of posts to "test" list. > > Well, yes? The purpose of the test@ list clearly didn't include those > mails, so they were moved. They are clearly also not appropriate for > devel@, because they're about QA tooling development. Are downtime announcements for AutoQA posted only to that list? > > Moving all Rawhide topics, build failures, build report, package version > > upgrade annoucements, ABI breakage announcements, Branched report, Rawhide > > report, from devel to test list would be the way to go. > > Well, no it wouldn't, because most of those mails are relevant to > *developers* (or rather, packagers), not testers. Which is why they're > sent to devel@. Build failures are fixed by packagers. ABI bumps are > fixed by packagers. The errors identified on the Branched and Rawhide > reports are fixed by packagers. Why are "rawhide report" and "F-20 Branched reported" also sent to test list? Why the duplication? Why are the F-19 and F-18 updates-testing reports not sent to users list to raise awareness of what updates may be releases as stable updates in after a few days already? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
