Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
From: Przemek Klosowski <przemek.klosowski@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:36:53 -0400
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51ED8DC9.8050308@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7

On 07/22/2013 03:53 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:

On 07/22/2013 06:13 PM, Eric Smith wrote:

But it's not an objective of Fedora to have long-term-stable releases
suitable for running servers!


Says who?

That is because Fedora has a 13 month support policyhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle , so you haveto upgrade or reinstall every 19 months. This is not compatible withlong-term-stable.

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"

References:
- RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)
  - From: Matthew Miller
- Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)
  - From: Matthew Miller
- Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: Stephen Gallagher
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: Kevin Fenzi
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: Stephen Gallagher
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: Eric Smith
- Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"

Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)
Next by Date: Re: F20 System Wide Change: No Default Sendmail
Previous by thread: Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
Next by thread: Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]