On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:52 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/22/2013 04:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> They chose to use a _downstream_ distribution. RHEL *is* Fedora, it's >> just a Fedora that's been hardened and held to a certain level of >> ABI/API compatibility. > Which is my point exactly instead of helping increasing the overall quality > of Fedora the infrastructure decide to run to another distribution. > > RHEL != Fedora But it's not an objective of Fedora to have long-term-stable releases suitable for running servers! No one in their right mind runs any rapid development distribution (not just Fedora) on critical infrastructure. If you think Fedora should somehow transition into being a good distribution for critical infrastructure, you'll have to propose some radical changes to Fedora to make that happen. It is a Good Thing that RHEL != Fedora. If RHEL did rapid development instead of long term stable, people wouldn't buy it. If Fedora did long term stable instead of rapid development, we'd need yet another distribution to do the rapid development. Eric -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
