Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/22/2013 02:52 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:28:52PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
What better time to move epel out of Fedora since is really not
related to Fedora et all but is strictly for downstream distribution
based upon us to use ( like RHEL and it's clones )

I'm not sure what you think needs to be "moved out of Fedora".  Governance
of EPEL is separate.  Packagers are allowed to be independent.  in your
previous post you mention the word "infrastructure".  If you're just talking
about the fact that epel shares the same koji, bodhi, git, etc with Fedora,
I'm not sure what harm those do to us right now and I can see a large amount
of benefit in terms of the manpower required to maintain those systems.

For Epel yes, for RHEL yes for Fedora no

Could you please go into what is troubling you more?

Reluctant changes and cleanups to components and their spec files and our packing guidelines due to them being maintained in Epel and RHEL.

Put epel under RHEL-EXTRA or it's own domain or something and be done with it so our project process is not limited RHEL or other downstream distribution to us.

JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux