On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 12:13 -0600, Eric Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:52 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 07/22/2013 04:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> They chose to use a _downstream_ distribution. RHEL *is* Fedora, it's > >> just a Fedora that's been hardened and held to a certain level of > >> ABI/API compatibility. > > Which is my point exactly instead of helping increasing the overall quality > > of Fedora the infrastructure decide to run to another distribution. > > > > RHEL != Fedora > > But it's not an objective of Fedora to have long-term-stable releases > suitable for running servers! No one in their right mind runs any > rapid development distribution (not just Fedora) on critical > infrastructure. Is _that_ why the nice men in white coats keep showing up and taking me away to the bouncy bouncy room?! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
