Re: EPEL (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/22/2013 08:04 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> said:
On 07/22/2013 06:13 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:52 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
<johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

   No one in their right mind runs any
rapid development distribution (not just Fedora) on critical
infrastructure.
That's your opinion and I'm sure many in the server sub-community
disagree with that statement.
It is the opinion of many professional system adminstrators.

Which with that statement of his especially dismiss a whole sub community of us.

Well good for them many professional system adminstrators.

I have had no problem deploying Fedora and using Fedora in critical
infrastructural in similar fashion as Andy wrote on his blog [1]
Creating throw-away instances and replacing them every 6 months

13months be more accurate at least I myself have never gone 6 months nor have recommended it.

  may be
okay for the rapid-development web designers, but most real system
adminstrators have more than enough work to do than to re-test their
application stack for new deployments every 6 months.  I build servers
to last for years so that I don't have to touch them again for a long
time.


As do I on daily bases and have for years I have also designed and deployed agile infrastructure myself and where asked to .

JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux